飛羽大同 allbird.org - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Nikkor 600/4 VR & 500/4 VR [打印本頁]

作者: kkhui 時間: 2008-2-4 13:03 標題: Nikkor 600/4 VR & 500/4 VR

Thought some of you what to know ...

The list price for 600/4 VR and 500/4 VR are HK$75,000- and 63,000- respectively according to Nikon (HK). Both lenses have not hit the street yet but would be anytime soon. Only the 400/2.8 VR is with dealers now.

作者: simonchan888 時間: 2008-2-5 00:28

心裏對 Vibration Reduction 這設置於拍鳥的作用仍存有疑問，曾以手持 afs328/2.8VR 開動 VR 拍攝止物體，在1/30s 仍有不錯的成像，但拍走動的鳥時則未如理想。
600/4 VR 及 500/4 VR 與 600/4 II 及 500/4 II 約是HK$20,000的價差，假設 VR 版的解像力較 afs II 版好，但若VR對拍鳥的幫助不大，而價差只可換來較好一點兒的成像，那麼是否物有所值，則見仁見智，正等待機會解開這疑團~~~

作者: JackLi 時間: 2008-2-5 02:15

这个VR可以在脚架上用，应该还是有用的。。。

作者: Hendrix 時間: 2008-2-5 10:18

The street price for 600/4 VR should be HK$68000-

試過 428 VR vs 428II , PQ look same .
but VR sure help 428 on monopad

作者: Frankiechu 時間: 2008-2-15 18:30

我覺得多左1 層納米結晶塗層有好大分別...在任可光線下表現比上一代都理想....

[ 本帖最後由 Frankiechu 於 2008-2-15 18:31 編輯 ]

作者: simonchan888 時間: 2008-2-15 19:13

引用:

原帖由 Frankiechu 於 2008-2-15 18:30 發表
我覺得多左1 層納米結晶塗層有好大分別...在任可光線下表現比上一代都理想....

Frankie 兄，其它方面表現跟 AFS600/4 II 比較如何..？如 AF 速度、成像....

作者: rayy 時間: 2008-2-16 02:17

我比較關心500/4新加vr於手持時的兼容度和成像........如效果滿意會直接影響拍攝範圍........呢個就有一定成度的突破

作者: JackLi 時間: 2008-2-16 04:03

朋友上星期下了order，看来下个星期也该有了，哈。。到时候拿来玩玩。。。

作者: ckn 時間: 2008-2-16 18:14

引用:

原帖由 Frankiechu 於 2008-2-15 18:30 發表
我覺得多左1 層納米結晶塗層有好大分別...在任可光線下表現比上一代都理想....

Frankie C-Hing,

May I be advised whether the PQ of the new VR lens is acceptable or not after adding TC17/TC20, please ?

My experience with adding TC17 to AFS 300/4 is still acceptable, whereas it is not for the AFS 500/4 II lens. If the PQ of the new VR lens remains acceptable after adding TC17/TC20, I may consider upgrading my AFS 500/4 to its VR version. Thanks.

作者: Frankiechu 時間: 2008-2-18 18:29

要我做則試....我真係唔在行!!!!我用了三四次的感覺係E一代...一定係質數最高...

作者: ckn 時間: 2008-2-18 18:57

Frankie C-Hing,

Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I dare not ask you to conduct a complicated test, just wish to know whether you feel comfortable to add TC17/TC20 to the new VR lens or not. Anyway, your statement "...我用了三四次的感覺係E一代...一定係質數最高..." has answered my question already. Thanks a lot.

作者: Frankiechu 時間: 2008-2-19 22:58

引用:

原帖由 ckn 於 2008-2-18 18:57 發表
Frankie C-Hing,

Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I dare not ask you to conduct a complicated test, just wish to know whether you feel comfortable to add TC17/TC20 to the new VR lens or not. Anyway, yo ...

TC14/TC17/TC20 all have VR 14&17 is good 20 no good

作者: ckn 時間: 2008-2-20 14:57

引用:

原帖由 Frankiechu 於 2008-2-19 22:58 發表

TC14/TC17/TC20 all have VR 14&17 is good 20 no good

Thanks.

作者: Peter 時間: 2008-2-26 13:56

好想知新鏡VR版和上一代AFS II 版兩代影像質數和速度有冇太大的差別呢...........????

作者: Timk 時間: 2008-3-29 11:55

My experience with the 500/4 VR is quite good. I can handheld it down to about 1/200 sec.

On the other hand I found it very difficult to get a sharp photo handhelding the Sigma 500/4.5, even at much higher speed.

作者: Hendrix 時間: 2008-3-29 13:10 標題: 回復 15# 的帖子

try MLU if can , I can get 1/15 with MLU ( 1 out of 3 photo sharp ) .

http://allbird.org/forum/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1

作者: Timk 時間: 2008-3-29 14:21

I'll try that too. I am still experimenting with this lens.

I didn't use MLU in Napel because it affects my speed. I want to get as many frames as possible .... the classic machine-gun approach!

歡迎光臨飛羽大同 allbird.org (http://allbird.org/forum/)